Contains No Animal Products (CNAP)

CONTAINS ANIMAL PRODUCTS (CAP)

CONTAINS NO ANIMAL PRODUCTS (CNAP)


ANIMALS ARE ALLERGENS.

If you’re allergic to fur, then you’re allergic to skin. If you’re allergic to skin, then you’re allergic to flesh. If you’re allergic to flesh, then you’re allergic to blood.

All humans are sensitive to animal products. You have an animal sensitivity. Every human does.

People in the past blamed how badly they felt on anything but the animal. Strange isn’t it? – how we never made that connection, never even inquired, wondered. It was always something else in our mind that took the blame.

Till now.

It’s not the macaroni salad; it’s the steak. It’s not the cake; it’s the eggs in the cake. It’s not the coffee; it’s the cream in the coffee. Get it now?

Okay, then let’s get some labels printed.

Under the allergen category on all labels on all products insert either CAP or CNAP. Contains Animal Products or Contains No Animal Products






 

The Skin Trade

FAKE POCKETS 1

No more fake pockets on anything I wear. Fake pockets are not a positive fashion statement for the industry or those donning them. It spells cheap. Trying to trick somebody into thinking they have more pockets than they do? What’s the point here, except to delude the buyer into thinking they have something they don’t? How much more could it cost?

No more fake pockets. Women need more real pockets, so they don’t have to take purses everywhere they go. Too many people picking pockets? Is that why the industry does it? Purse snatching too. I’m not on vacation here. I don’t need cargo pants every time I go out. Just put real pockets where the fake ones reside and I’ll be happy. Deep too. Why only real pockets in the back? Easier to pick those pockets. Button them down. Everybody wants side pockets. Deep there too. Why apply a pocket only to lose what gets jostled as you walk? They’re as useless as the fake pocket. Okay I’m not talking down to my knees. You know how to do it. So do it. And don’t double the cost of the pants.

It’s not that I oppose fake. Fake on moral grounds I applaud. Fake fur yes. It’s a major step in the only moral and sane direction. People I see all over the internet flaunting their barbarism – men, women – who scream about their owns rights, wanting the world to feel their pain, don’t give a hoot about the rights of any other animal.

Utility plus fashion is what I want. No one wears a fur coat to stay warm. Why do you want some other animal’s hair on your body? Grow your own hair. It’s not sexy, it’s perverse. Mexican snake and lizard boots? Why? Because you can? You can trample on every other animal’s rights, but who screams loudest when you feel slighted? YOU DO. How many snakes, how many minks, rabbits, foxes? Moccasins? Why today? Why now? Find a better way. More sane, less barbaric. Why inflict suffering and pain? Skinned alive they were – those animals you wear as status symbols of your wealth and ignorance. People in HUD buildings wearing fur coats. One must wonder about that.

There is a law against skinning anybody for any reason. You know that law. I know you do.

If humans had thicker skin, that would be on the fashion runways too. Maybe it already is, as an ingredient in an otherwise human (not man) made fabric. Yeah. To Winter People: Throw those stupid blood coats and blood hats away. You look like idiots trying to be another animal. Who are you kidding? Find a better way. What century did you get stuck in? To The World I Say: Unstick yourself before you become the prey.

Predators. You’re all predators. No animal coat, no animal hat, but a chicken, lamb, pig, goat, buffalo, deer, bird, dog, cat, cow, snake in your belly? I’m not a hide to protect your hands and feet either. Find a better way. What? God made a cow for every person in the world to raise, kill and skin for foot protection?

You can go ahead and argue all you want. It’s not up to God, it’s up to those you skin. They all said NO.

You would too.

The skin trade is a huge industry built around the worst torture imaginable. There is no upside, no compassionate way. It’s all bad. If you buy, then you are guilty of crimes against other species. You are guilty of slavery, torture and slaughter. No God is going to come to your defense, so stop praying.






People are calling for this ‘sexist’ and ‘degrading’ advert to be removed

901624880e556545f7e0fcaebf09b925

“Degrading” Saint Laurent Campaign Under Fire by French Ad Watchdog

 Kristina Rodulfo, Elle c7ba0b49997c673509efc72b3ff43813

Finish reading: People are calling for this ‘sexist’ and ‘degrading’ advert to be removed


CNAP COMMENT: What are they selling in this advertisement? Roller skates, sexy stools, fish net stockings, perfume, a weight loss plan, children for sale for sex? Spiked shoes? Can you buy online? Gay designers like to make bitches out of straight women? Gay designers want to degrade children by choice of models?

Roller skates connote child.

Skinny, breastless connotes child.

Bending over a stool without having to be tied connotes submission, complaint, lifeless = child.

Child sex is nothing new to the French nor to children of French culture.

Time to change what needs to be changed, wouldn’t you say?

Yves Saint Laurent!!!!!

Why no fur? OMGod, there is fur. I barely noticed it. Right in front of me it was all the time.

I actually went to google to research whether Yves Saint Laurent uses fur in their ads and this same ad popped up. Fur. White. Don’t know the animal you stole it from, right off his/her back while still alive, but it looks like a dead now animal. Maybe it is faux fur?

Think wherever your mind wants to take you will be their artistic reply. No. That’s not going to happen. I demand to know if that fur came from an animal or not? Truth in advertising is what we call it. If you’re in the ad business, then you know the drill.

So that’s what you’re selling? Fur coats, stoles, for children? This is beginning to sound a little like Michelle Obama going on the television program called Junior Chefs, where they’re taught to use every part of the animal. At a very young age, they’re expose to all the guts. For Valentine’s Day or some holiday about hearts, they had to cook a real heart taken from an animal. The slaughter industry is working with Michelle Obama to indoctrinate children into becoming animal chefs and eating all parts of all animals. With a few veggies thrown in to make it look Kosher and all, they’ll fool everybody while keeping the youth of the world addicted to the flesh and blood.

Obama is going to be a judge. How does being First Lady qualify her for that? She never worked that garden at the white house. Those were photo ops. She’s no farmer and she’s no chef either.

Yves Saint Laurent is using the young girl image as an indoctrination tool to make young girls into sex slaves and consumers of fur.

Gay designers need to stop humiliating children and women through their so-called art. It is obscene and no longer acceptable in this world. It’s called slavery in case you conveniently thought you could portray girls any way you like, as long as you call it art. What you do is not art. It’s indoctrination into slavery.

If you’re going to put a fur coat on a child image, to sexually entice men to buy whatever you’re selling, then we need to plan a funeral.

You know what needs to change. Change it.

The ARPP rules regarding advertising in France need to state that advertisements should maintain “dignity and respect in representation of any animal including humans”.