TAFC ClipBoard: In my view, religion doesn’t have much to do with what people eat. Nowhere in the bible or teachings does it instruct people to eat animals; in fact it does the opposite:
“Genesis 1:29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food.”
The Jews and Muslims who insist on slaughtering animals by hanging them upside down, slicing their throats and bleeding them out while conscious, do so based on superstitions that claim stunning the animal injects fear, thus poisons into the meat.
Somehow they don’t think hanging cows upside down, slicing their throats and bleeding them out while they writhe in pain doesn’t create the same fear response as stunning them unconscious before committing the carnage.
It looks like the slaughter industries are pandering to the religious cults who for perverse reasons want to see the suffering animals meet their death fully conscious, so they can enjoy eating their flesh without fear of poisons entering their bloodstream from being stunned before death.
It’s barbaric is what it is, and if someone subscribes to a religion based on barbarous acts, much like religious sacrifice, out of the dark ages, then laws must be passed to protect the animals from that religion and that horror, just to put so-called clean meat on the plate.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that those involved in the slaughter would easily bend to the will of future customers who want the slaughterers to perform unnatural acts on the animals as they die. Slicing the throat of a healthy animal, held upside down in a barrel, thrashing to be free is perverse, unnatural and barbaric and needs to be banned worldwide.
It shouldn’t even be considered – the pros and cons. There should not even be a debate.
The only faith-based position on slaughter should be not to raise animals for slaughter in the first place. It is stark evil to dismember an animal for consumption when the planet is abundant with plants for food.
The author appears to be non-accepting of those who he claims impose their convictions of not eating animals on others, while at the same time accepting of those whose convictions involve slaughter of animals for food without anesthesia: “…others feel compelled to more loudly advocate that all consumers should discontinue eating meat on moral grounds and feel justified in attempting to impose their convictions on others.“
If these activists were few in number and only advocated for themselves not to consume the slaughter, then he’d be okay with it? Of course, if there was no slaughter he and his family would be out of business. So he courts the Jews and Muslims who demand the essence of a surgical procedure absent anesthesia for each animal they kill.
The killing is immoral and wanting the animal to feel the pain of such a brutal death is immoral on top of immoral. sldt
I grew up on a farm where we raised a lot of our own food, including the meat we ate from our own animals. I can’t remember ever having any ethical or moral issues in my mind or conscience about raising animals for food or eating meat in general. We weren’t a very religious family in the church-going sense, but we did believe that God made all things, including providing food and animals for eating.
Eating meat was always a normal part of life, and this included the animals we raised having to eventually die so we could be sustained with protein. This seemed totally normal to me. I was never really forced to consider the ethical implications of eating meat, nor did I have to defend my beliefs or my choice to eat meat to others. Only later in life did that ever become a factor.
As an adult, I worked for seven years in a beef fabrication plant that processed hanging beef sides into sub-primals, steaks and grinds. Most the beef we sourced was slaughtered in a kosher plant, so we expanded into kosher beef production with Israeli-trained rabbis working alongside our meat cutters.
The rabbis came into our plant four days a week, and I had many chances to talk with some of them about their beliefs, convictions and training. We also started processing halal beef, and I worked closely with the halal certification agency to set up our halal program.
Producing and selling kosher and halal beef afforded me a broad exposure to people of different faiths, and I hold faith convictions of my own. I discovered that the rich, long-held traditions of eating meat, including slaughtering and processing methodologies, is critically important for many people of faith. By selling kosher beef and halal beef to customers of faiths that I otherwise never would have met, I’ve begun to learn not only how their convictions prescribe the proper handing of meat, but why.
In my next few blogs, I’ll be considering how our religious convictions, or lack of any, affect our decision to eat meat. Though discussing religion can be a socially awkward topic, it can be beneficial to our understanding of how it affects our industry, in the context of a rational and peaceful discussion.
In a forthcoming blogs, I’ll be considering kosher and halal processing and the faith-based convictions that each hold that drive their meat-eating decisions. Why do they continue to hold to the ancient traditions they practice? Why do some kosher programs only allow the chuck and rib portions of the beef carcass to be consumed? Why is the demand for halal meat production increasing so rapidly?
Then I’ll devote a blog to reviewing the newly published book, “What Would Jesus Really Eat: The Biblical Case for Eating Meat.” You can find that book by clicking here if you’re interested in reading it.
I’ll examine the position of a growing number of people, some religious and some secular, that eating meat is immoral and unethical. Some quietly refrain from eating meat because of personal sensitivities or because it bothers their consciences. But others feel compelled to more loudly advocate that all consumers should discontinue eating meat on moral grounds and feel justified in attempting to impose their convictions on others.
It’s obviously a very different world now than it was in the 70s and 80s when I was growing up on the farm. Back then, no one seemed to challenge the ethics of eating meat. Today, polarizing belief systems complicate the landscape in ways that are hard to predict.
Bloom is owner of U.S. Protein, an international distributor of premium meats. Contact him at email@example.com. The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of beefmagazine.com or Farm Progress.